Merkle Eligibility
This page explains how to use our Merkle Eligibility module.
The Merkle eligibility module was set up to allow a predefined array of criteria to be defined that is then validated against in a precursory check, before the token can be deemed eligible.
This module was primarily developed to allow for ENS domains to be deemed eligible, or ineligible, though there are more use-cases available. For the purpose of this document I will be applying the logic to that of the ENS flow implemented.
The reason that a merkle approach is required for ENS is that the name of the token cannot be extracted from the token itself. This would mean that for handling a collection such as the #10KClub (in which only numeric domains from 0000 to 9999 are included) we would not be able to apply a simple conditional statement to check the range. We also would not be able to simply define a list of immutable token IDs inside the vault as the deployment gas costs would be extremely high.
To combat this we instead only require the application of a merkle root (
bytes32) onto the contract and then require a precursory check that passes a merkle proof alongside the token ID to gauge eligibility and apply it to an internally eligibility mapping.If you'd like to read more into the application of merkle trees on the blockchain, I'd recommend reading Using Merkle Trees for NFT Whitelists by @ItsCuzzo.
When working with ENS domains, we need to encode and decode them in a specific way to ensure they stay the same across the frontend website and on-chain.
In my document examples you will see regular reference to a helper function called
getTokenId that is subsequently encoded with keccak256. This creates two vital steps for ENS domains. The getTokenId returns the tokenId that an ENS name has. You can test this by encoding a name and checking the listing on Opensea.function getTokenId(domain) {
return ethers.BigNumber.from(ethers.utils.id(domain.toLowerCase())).toString();
}
Note: This method excludes the
.eth suffix.When we then encode the return value with
keccak256 we get the ENS tokenHash. Both the tokenId and tokenHash, if calculated correctly, will correspond to the stored data on the ENS Subgraph.Generating our Merkle Tree uses 2 Node JS library:
- merkletreejs
- keccak256
The following code flow shows how to generate an ENS-compliant merkle tree, generate the root and generate a subsequent proof for later eligibility checks. Alternatively, an online tool can be used for testing. Note, that
sortPairs must be set to True.We want to store our leaves in
bytes32 format, which is outputted from the keccak256 encryption for consistent and gas-efficient storage. // Set up our Merkle tree leaves
const leaves = [
keccak256(getTokenId('a')),
keccak256(getTokenId('b')),
keccak256(getTokenId('c')),
];
// Create a merkle tree containing the leaves defined above.
const tree = new MerkleTree(leaves, keccak256, {sortPairs: true});
// Generate our tree's merkle root
const merkleRoot = tree.getHexRoot();
// Generate a proof for b.eth
const tokenHash = keccak256(getTokenId('b'));
// Calculate our tree's proof from our tokenHash
const proof = tree.getHexProof(tokenHash);
Once we have our proof for the
tokenHash, we can call our precursory processing function. In most eligibility modules we can just directly call eligibility, but in order for our merkle tree approach to work, this function must be called at least once per token to ensure it's added to our validTokenHashes mapping./**
* @notice This will run a precursory check by encoding the token ID, creating the
* token hash, and then checking this against our merkle tree.
*
* @param tokenId The ENS token ID being validated
* @param merkleProof Merkle proof to validate against the tokenId
*
* @return bool If the token is valid
*/
function processToken(uint tokenId, bytes32[] calldata merkleProof) public returns (bool) {
// Get the hashed equivalent of our tokenId
bytes32 tokenHash = keccak256(bytes(Strings.toString(tokenId)));
// Determine if our domain is eligible by traversing our merkle tree
bool isValid = MerkleProof.verify(merkleProof, merkleRoot, tokenHash);
// Mark our hash as processed
validTokenHashes[tokenHash] = isValid;
_processedTokenHashes[tokenHash] = true;
// Let our stalkers know that we are making the request
emit PrecursoryCheckStarted(tokenId, tokenHash);
emit PrecursoryCheckComplete(tokenId, tokenHash, isValid);
return isValid;
}
Once our precursory check has been run for the token and we have deemed it valid and eligible, we are ready to mint it to the vault. Internally, the vault will just check that the encoded
tokenId (creating the tokenHash) has been mapped as valid./**
* @notice Checks if a supplied token is eligible, which is defined by our merkle
* tree root assigned at initialisation.
*
* @dev This check requires the token to have already been passed to `processToken`.
*
* @return bool If the tokenId is eligible
*/
function _checkIfEligible(uint tokenId) internal view override virtual returns (bool) {
return validTokenHashes[keccak256(bytes(Strings.toString(tokenId)))];
}
To ensure that the
tokenId is correctly mapped to the tokenHash we must convert our tokenId to a String and then into bytes before calling keccak256. Failure to do this results in an incorrect tokenHash being generated.
The happy path for validating an ENS domain against the module
Last modified 7mo ago